Recently, public discussion surged after a bipedal robot on display at a technology exhibition was spotted bearing the logo of Hanoi University of Science and Technology.

Many pointed out that the robot was originally manufactured abroad, yet the HUST logo was used to cover the original branding, potentially causing misunderstanding about the robot's origin.

Addressing the issue, Associate Professor Dr. Huynh Dang Chinh, Vice President of HUST, explained that the robot’s mechanical components were legally imported through a university-affiliated enterprise. The manufacturer had provided official authorization for the robot’s use in development, training, research, and technology transfer.

Based on this, a research group led by HUST lecturers developed new control algorithms that enhanced the robot’s capabilities, including improved stability on complex terrain, better adaptation to changing heights, and the ability to climb curved staircases.

These advanced features were demonstrated at the exhibition. For educational purposes, the research group also developed specialized software and instructional materials allowing lecturers and students to program the robot, integrate artificial intelligence, and manage motion control directly.

The university clarified that the bipedal robot showcased at the exhibition is a transparent educational and research tool developed by its research team.

Due to the lengthy duration of the exhibition and the high volume of visitors, many institutions used labels to manage and safeguard their exhibits. The HUST team used paper stickers bearing the university’s logo on all items, including the bipedal robot, for this purpose. Unfortunately, one of these stickers was mistakenly placed over the manufacturer's original logo.

"Although a signboard describing the robot's features was available at the exhibition, the use of the university's logo for marking purposes unintentionally caused some attendees to misunderstand the robot’s origin. We sincerely thank the public for their feedback and accept full responsibility, learning from this incident to avoid similar issues in future events," Dr. Chinh said.

Regarding accountability, Dr. Chinh stated that as soon as feedback was received, HUST’s leadership immediately initiated a review process and required all relevant individuals and departments to submit detailed explanations.

The research team and involved departments fulfilled their responsibilities, providing complete and transparent information as requested.

"The university’s leadership has strictly reprimanded the individuals and departments involved for this oversight. We have also submitted a report to the appropriate authorities," Dr. Chinh confirmed.

Thuy Nga